The time has come for an honest debate on one of the great taboos of our time, the exploitation of the words 'anti-semitism', racism, xenophobia and Islamphobia by political activists to conflate them with criticisms of Israel, Zionists, Muslims, Islam, Pro-Israel lobby groups and Christian Zionists etc etc.
Let me first state that as a Nationalist I support Israels right to exist, its right to govern its own internal affairs and its right to respond as it sees fit to any external and internal threats to its national security.
But I am first and foremost a BRITISH NATIONALIST who puts the interest of Britain and the British people first at all times.
Democracy and the freedom of association should not be allowed to exist as subversion and treason.
The very presence within the British political system and nation of organised groups whose political loyalties and interests are orientated primarily towards Israel (or towards Germany, France, Alaska, Burma, Jamaica, Papua New Guinea or whatever etc etc) is unacceptable.
Neither is it acceptable to be more loyal to the Pope, the Koran or the Communist International than to the British Nation and the British people.
A British citizen should first and foremost place at all times the interests of the British people and British nation before all other interests or loyalties.
Those that seek to attack loyal and patriotic British citizens on the basis of their being Jews, Christians or Muslims etc are criminals not because they are anti-semites, Christianophobes or Islamaphobes, but simply because THEY ARE CRIMINALS !
The very existence of a pro-Israel Lobby, a Christian Zionist Lobby, a pro-US lobby, the Common Purpouse groups, Islamist groups and a Muslim Parliament of Great Britain are all examples of provocative groups that should be banned from existing within Britain.
Those with British citzenship who put the interests of foreign nations, their religions or their ideology before their loyalty to the British nation and people are not true British citizens.
They are abusing their citizenship rights in order to promote the interests of others first.
Communities should be allowed to work to promote solely the social interests of their respective communities (such as to organise health campaigns and school funding campaigns etc) but not to engage in any forms of political campaigning in the UK.
We have tolerated these interlopers with their exclusivist and treasonous agendas for far too long.
Those that persist in such activities should be stripped of their citizenship rights.
They have used their money, power and influence to usurp and control our national independence and independent foreign policies for far too long.
These groups have pushed for us to get involved in foreign wars, to send British troops to die in far flung battles that are meaningless to the interests of the British people and our national security interests, they have pushed for us to surrender our national sovereignity to supra-national institutions such as the EU, WTO, UN, US and other internationalist organisations and they have caused many peoples and nations around the world to come to hate Britain for what they see as our slavish obedience to special interest groups.
If we have a threat in this country as regards our national security then we demand the British Army are returned home to fight it and destroy that threat.We dont want them patrolling the streets of Baghdad or the foothills of Kabul whilst Islamists are blowing up tube trains in the UK and millions of illegal immigrants and aliens flood through our national borders every year.
The British Army should be at Dover, Tilbury, Heathrow and Gatwick with bayonets fixed and operating x-ray machines to scan every lorry, car and plane for illegal immigrants entering the UK instead of hunting down Al Qaeda in Iraq.
We should have the RAF based in the UK and using their Hercules transport planes and air fleet to deport the millions of illegal immigrants in the UK back to their home countries instead of the RAF being busy dropping supplies to beseiged British troops in Afghanistan.
We should have the Royal Navy searching boats and ship bringing goods for guns, drugs and immgrants coming into the UK not patrolling the sea lanes of Iraq.
We should have the SAS on operations executing and assassinating Islamist terrorists, child smugglers, sex slave smugglers, drug smugglers and weapons importers who bring their vile trade into the UK not tracking down Islamists in Tora Bora.
Nationalism is simply about supporting and working for the best interests of Britain and the British people.
The fact that this is defined as racism / anti-semitism / Islamaphobia / xenophobia etc etc is proof that we are ruled by cabals of traitors.
This very lexicon is the lexicon of the traitors, and therefore all those that use words from this lexicon reveal their treasonous nature.
It is simply treason for any individual to support anything before the interests of the British nation and people.
The time has come for Britons to put Britain First.Those that cannot do that should be deported from the country, and the sooner the exodus of traitors from this nations begins, and the repatriation of the British army back to Britain to secure our national borders begins- then the safer we will all be in our own country.
BRITAIN FIRST !
Friday, January 25, 2008
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
The West At Risk say Retired NATO Generals
Hugely important article in The Times here ;
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=IUZSY4L4F155VQFIQMGSFF4AVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2008/01/22/wnato122.xml
Note that the article makes explicit reference to the dangers to Britain and the West from mass immigration.
" Nato must prepare to launch pre-emptive nuclear attacks to ward off the use of weapons of mass destruction by its enemies, a group of former senior military officials has warned.
Terrorism, political fanaticism and religious fundamentalism were major threats to the West, and organised crime, climate change and migration on a mass scale posed dangers to the way of life of Nato members. "
When you have retired generals warning the West that NATO is sitting on its hands and ignoring the threats to the Wests's very survival then that is dereliction of duty by the political elite that misrules our nation.
Their apathy and ignorance is putting us all in danger.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=IUZSY4L4F155VQFIQMGSFF4AVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2008/01/22/wnato122.xml
Note that the article makes explicit reference to the dangers to Britain and the West from mass immigration.
" Nato must prepare to launch pre-emptive nuclear attacks to ward off the use of weapons of mass destruction by its enemies, a group of former senior military officials has warned.
Terrorism, political fanaticism and religious fundamentalism were major threats to the West, and organised crime, climate change and migration on a mass scale posed dangers to the way of life of Nato members. "
When you have retired generals warning the West that NATO is sitting on its hands and ignoring the threats to the Wests's very survival then that is dereliction of duty by the political elite that misrules our nation.
Their apathy and ignorance is putting us all in danger.
Kosher Nazis and Anti-Jihadism
For all those that are BRITISH NATIONALISTS this is what we stand for ;
1) We are against the Islamist and Jihadists that threaten our nations and our way of life
2) We are against the Christian Fundamentalists that wish to use our nation and our military as a mechanism to support Israel on the basis of their insane theological eschatology
3) We are again the Zionist / Pro-Israel Lobby Groups that have such huge undue power in our political systems and whose influence is used to support Israel and its foreign policy
4) We are against the Middle Eastern oil theocracies and monarchies who use their oil and wealth as a way to take over our nations via the economic system
For those interested in how the Anti-Jihadist movement has been hijacked by Christian Fundamentalists and Pro-Israel / Pro-Zionism groups please read my articles on the issue here ;
http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/
We stand for an INDEPENDENT Britain, one that has no interest in embroiling itself in the wars in the Middle East or anywhere else for that matter.
1) We are against the Islamist and Jihadists that threaten our nations and our way of life
2) We are against the Christian Fundamentalists that wish to use our nation and our military as a mechanism to support Israel on the basis of their insane theological eschatology
3) We are again the Zionist / Pro-Israel Lobby Groups that have such huge undue power in our political systems and whose influence is used to support Israel and its foreign policy
4) We are against the Middle Eastern oil theocracies and monarchies who use their oil and wealth as a way to take over our nations via the economic system
For those interested in how the Anti-Jihadist movement has been hijacked by Christian Fundamentalists and Pro-Israel / Pro-Zionism groups please read my articles on the issue here ;
http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/
We stand for an INDEPENDENT Britain, one that has no interest in embroiling itself in the wars in the Middle East or anywhere else for that matter.
Sunday, January 20, 2008
Jacqui Smith buys kebab.

JACQUI SMITH, the home secretary (pictured left) and arch enemy of THE MYSTERONS ( who are not Muslims), has admitted she would feel unsafe walking the streets of London late at night.
In an interview with The Sunday Times, she said she would not feel comfortable out alone after dark in deprived areas such as Hackney or even affluent ones like Kensington or Chelsea. She claimed streets at night were safer after 10 years of Labour in power but opposition politicians said her comments exposed the failure of the government’s policies on crime.
In the interview, Smith, the first woman home secretary, was asked whether she would feel safe walking on her own around Hackney at midnight. She replied: “Well, no, but I don’t think I’d ever have done. You know, I would never have done that, at any point during my life.” Asked why not, she answered: “Well, I just don’t think that’s a thing that people do, is it, really?”
" In real life all women in Britain go straight to bed after dark or if they are outside after dark then they are either hookers, sorry sex workers, or hoodies. "
It was pointed out that some people, such as shift workers and sex workers (the new name for prostitutes), had no choice.
She replied " That may be true but doesnt everyone go to sleep when it gets dark. My cat does and so does my parrot. The MYSTERONS dont though, they have ten eyes that can see in the dark and five legs that allow them to run as fast as a cheetah and machine guns instead of fingers that fire laser beams. They are not Muslims though. "
She was also asked whether she would feel unsafe walking around an area such as Kensington and Chelsea. “Well, I wouldn’t walk around at midnight and I’m fortunate that I don’t have to do that,” she replied " I live in an Ivory Tower surrounded by fat coppers with machine guns and therefore I am as out of tough with reality as Michael Jackson is in Neverland. Thats why I make such a good politician, because the real world is not something I know a lot about. I know about the MYSTERONS though, and those evil alien terrorist bastards have to be crushed before they take over the world, though they are not Muslims remember. "
Smith, who is protected by police bodyguards, said she had walked around Redditch, her Worcestershire constituency which is very like Peckham but without the drug dealers, gangsters and drive by shootings, though Redditch does have a young man with offensive zits who roams the streets and scares the non-Zitty population a lot.
“I don’t get the opportunity to walk around on my own now but I certainly have done in the recent past, on my own. I even one went to the shops once on my own and went into Poundland, which is a shop that sells everything for fifty pence. This proves I am just like you poor scruffy working class types who vote for me as I visit shops like Poundland too. ”
After the interview, a worried aide called The Sunday Times saying the wording had not come out as the home secretary had intended. She said Smith had recently “bought a kebab in Peckham. Jacqui was waiting outside the kebab shop in a tank whilst an Apache helicopter hovered overhead machine gunning any locals that got near the shop ”.
When pressed for details on the identity of the kebab shop her minion replied " That is a confidential police matter as is whether she had mint suce or mint yoghurt with it. The MYSTERONS may be able to track her down by the identity of the kebab " and refused to answer any more questions on the matter of the kebab.
(for members of the press / government / police reading this I have copyrighted the words THE MYSTERONS to describe the non-Muslim Islamist terrorists who are not motived by Islam/ Islamism. Therefore if any overpaid fifthwit in the Home Office uses my copyrighted phrase to describe Al Qaeda / THE MYSTERONS then I will sue your ass ).
Labels:
home secretary,
islamic terrorism,
jacqui smith
Saturday, January 19, 2008
Official Portrait of Tony Blair

The official portrait of Tony Blair has been released.
In memory of all those British troops who died in his murderous rampages, as Tony Blair has dragged Britain into more wars than any other Prime Minister in history.
Warmonger No.1.
Kosovo
Serbia
Sierra Leone
Iraq
Afghanistan
( Not Zimbabwe )
( He also surrendered Northern Ireland to the IR.A. )
Friday, January 18, 2008
Peak Oil and The Media

An interesting article in the Times today concerning the issue of Peak Oil and its looming threat.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article3207311.ece
The article states ;
Doom-laden forecasts that world oil supplies are poised to fall off the edge of a cliff are wide of the mark, according to leading oil industry experts who gave warning that human factors, not geology, will drive the oil market.
A landmark study of more than 800 oilfields by Cambridge Energy Research Associates (Cera) has concluded that rates of decline are only 4.5 per cent a year, almost half the rate previously believed, leading the consultancy to conclude that oil output will continue to rise over the next decade.
Peter Jackson, the report's author, said: “We will be able to grow supply to well over 100million barrels per day by 2017.” Current world oil output is in the region of 85million barrels a day.
The optimistic view of the world's oil resource was also given support by BP's chief economist, Peter Davies, who dismissed theories of “Peak Oil” as fallacious. Instead, he gave warning that world oil production would peak as demand weakened, because of political constraints, including taxation and government efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. "
Yet again this article reveals how issues as important as Peak Oil should not be left to journalists to discuss. Most journalists are just gullible muppets, they are sent by their editors to a conference, scribble a few notes and then return to write the story. Their editor then tweaks it so that it fits the newspapers political stance (in that it agrees with their sponsored political party that they propagandise) and then the story is printed.
The facts are rarely printed.
Fact 1 ) The Cambridge Energy Research Associates group is funded by the oil companies and also ancillary companies linked to the oil companies such as their accounting firms. Oil reserves for oil comapnies are like cash reserves for banks. The more oil an oil company says it has, then the higher its shares are worth. Therefore any research published by any organisation funded by the oil companies has to be further investigated and its findings confirmed before its reports can be accepted.
Fact 2 ) There are in fact 5 peaks in the Peak Oil scenario, not just one.
These are ;
A) The Peak Oil physical peak when the amount of oil consumed finally passes the half way point.
B) The Environmental Peak when the effect of decades of oil production and usage causes irreversible climate change that causes long term problems for the global eco-sphere.
C) The Economic Peak when the era of cheap oil ends and the debt based global petro-dollar recycling system collapses. Modern consumerism is based on cheap credit and cheap oil and the moment that the production costs of getting the oil, refining it and supplying it rises then that cost has to be passed on to the users of that oil. This price rise impacts at all points in the commodity production process at the same time as the consumer is themselves having to spend more money on energy costs both directly and indirectly. Consumerism is itself a product of the oil and energy exchange process and will be the first victim of Peak Oil.
D) The Political Peak is when nation states will no longer accept their servile status as dependents on imported oil and energy. The political peak is about ensuring national energy security, it is linked to the corporate takeover of nation states via middle eastern banks and Russian oligarchs who are buying up strategic sectors of our national infrastructure (docks, ports, banks, industries, water companies etc), and it concerns the awareness of the issue of future eco-conflicts and the oil wars such as Iraq and Afghanistan.
E) Peak Food which is the point when oil prices impact on food production costs and when the amount of food production dependent on oil can no longer supply all those that demand food.
http://www.moneyweek.com/file/35491/are-we-heading-for-peak-food.html
Each of these five peaks are all related to the Peak Oil issue.
Though the point when more than half the amount of oil used may be imminent, the other peaks are all imminent as well.
Climate change is increasing, energy bills are rising in the UK, the issue of energy security has become pressing due to the conflicts with Russia just as we are becoming dependent upon imported energy and Russian gas and oil supplies to fill the increasing energy gap and the number of people who are angry at the 'War For Oil' in Iraq is rising.
Oil demand is rising. An article in the Financial Times in June 2007 stated that ;
"The IEA now expects demand for oil to rise by 1.7m barrels a day this year compared to last year – an increase of about 2 per cent – and non-Opec oil supply to rise by just 900,000 b/d. That rise in demand is 167,000 b/d more than the IEA had previously estimated, while the rise in non-Opec supply is 97,000 b/d less.
The report estimated that world oil stocks could drop by 1m-1.5m barrels a day in the third quarter, which it said “would push forward stock cover down towards the low levels seen when prices accelerated higher in 2004. That is, by itself, a concern.”
The world population is rising and their expectations are rising. They all wants cars, air conditioning and DVD players and plasma televisions. They also demand more food. More people means more demands for food, fuel, energy, plastics and food – all highly dependent on oil. In the ten years from 2002 to 2012, the world population is expected to rise from 6.23 billion to 6.96 billion, an extra 12% to be fed, supplied and energised. Along with population, the other factor is the increasing use of oil in developing countries – countries which, up to now, had been contributing little to consumption.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article3207311.ece
The article states ;
Doom-laden forecasts that world oil supplies are poised to fall off the edge of a cliff are wide of the mark, according to leading oil industry experts who gave warning that human factors, not geology, will drive the oil market.
A landmark study of more than 800 oilfields by Cambridge Energy Research Associates (Cera) has concluded that rates of decline are only 4.5 per cent a year, almost half the rate previously believed, leading the consultancy to conclude that oil output will continue to rise over the next decade.
Peter Jackson, the report's author, said: “We will be able to grow supply to well over 100million barrels per day by 2017.” Current world oil output is in the region of 85million barrels a day.
The optimistic view of the world's oil resource was also given support by BP's chief economist, Peter Davies, who dismissed theories of “Peak Oil” as fallacious. Instead, he gave warning that world oil production would peak as demand weakened, because of political constraints, including taxation and government efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. "
Yet again this article reveals how issues as important as Peak Oil should not be left to journalists to discuss. Most journalists are just gullible muppets, they are sent by their editors to a conference, scribble a few notes and then return to write the story. Their editor then tweaks it so that it fits the newspapers political stance (in that it agrees with their sponsored political party that they propagandise) and then the story is printed.
The facts are rarely printed.
Fact 1 ) The Cambridge Energy Research Associates group is funded by the oil companies and also ancillary companies linked to the oil companies such as their accounting firms. Oil reserves for oil comapnies are like cash reserves for banks. The more oil an oil company says it has, then the higher its shares are worth. Therefore any research published by any organisation funded by the oil companies has to be further investigated and its findings confirmed before its reports can be accepted.
Fact 2 ) There are in fact 5 peaks in the Peak Oil scenario, not just one.
These are ;
A) The Peak Oil physical peak when the amount of oil consumed finally passes the half way point.
B) The Environmental Peak when the effect of decades of oil production and usage causes irreversible climate change that causes long term problems for the global eco-sphere.
C) The Economic Peak when the era of cheap oil ends and the debt based global petro-dollar recycling system collapses. Modern consumerism is based on cheap credit and cheap oil and the moment that the production costs of getting the oil, refining it and supplying it rises then that cost has to be passed on to the users of that oil. This price rise impacts at all points in the commodity production process at the same time as the consumer is themselves having to spend more money on energy costs both directly and indirectly. Consumerism is itself a product of the oil and energy exchange process and will be the first victim of Peak Oil.
D) The Political Peak is when nation states will no longer accept their servile status as dependents on imported oil and energy. The political peak is about ensuring national energy security, it is linked to the corporate takeover of nation states via middle eastern banks and Russian oligarchs who are buying up strategic sectors of our national infrastructure (docks, ports, banks, industries, water companies etc), and it concerns the awareness of the issue of future eco-conflicts and the oil wars such as Iraq and Afghanistan.
E) Peak Food which is the point when oil prices impact on food production costs and when the amount of food production dependent on oil can no longer supply all those that demand food.
http://www.moneyweek.com/file/35491/are-we-heading-for-peak-food.html
Each of these five peaks are all related to the Peak Oil issue.
Though the point when more than half the amount of oil used may be imminent, the other peaks are all imminent as well.
Climate change is increasing, energy bills are rising in the UK, the issue of energy security has become pressing due to the conflicts with Russia just as we are becoming dependent upon imported energy and Russian gas and oil supplies to fill the increasing energy gap and the number of people who are angry at the 'War For Oil' in Iraq is rising.
Oil demand is rising. An article in the Financial Times in June 2007 stated that ;
"The IEA now expects demand for oil to rise by 1.7m barrels a day this year compared to last year – an increase of about 2 per cent – and non-Opec oil supply to rise by just 900,000 b/d. That rise in demand is 167,000 b/d more than the IEA had previously estimated, while the rise in non-Opec supply is 97,000 b/d less.
The report estimated that world oil stocks could drop by 1m-1.5m barrels a day in the third quarter, which it said “would push forward stock cover down towards the low levels seen when prices accelerated higher in 2004. That is, by itself, a concern.”
The world population is rising and their expectations are rising. They all wants cars, air conditioning and DVD players and plasma televisions. They also demand more food. More people means more demands for food, fuel, energy, plastics and food – all highly dependent on oil. In the ten years from 2002 to 2012, the world population is expected to rise from 6.23 billion to 6.96 billion, an extra 12% to be fed, supplied and energised. Along with population, the other factor is the increasing use of oil in developing countries – countries which, up to now, had been contributing little to consumption.
The oil price has just reached an all time peak of $100 dollars a barrel.
The media are political in that they will only publicise problems the political parties they support think they can solve.
At the moment the media are seeking to undermine and trivialise the issue of Peak Oil as they know that the political parties they each support and propagandise ( The Times the Tories, The Guardian the Labour Party, the Independent the Lib Dems etc ) will not, and cannot , offer any long term solution to the problem.
The solution is simply Environmental Nationalism, the creation of a nation state predicated on the basis of sustainable national self sufficiency in energy, food, industry and economics.
The only party that offers that solution is the BNP.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
